SEO and service architecture
Titles, descriptions, headings, canonicals, robots directives, sitemap coverage, internal links and whether core services have distinct search intent instead of competing with one another.
A strong portfolio is not enough when search engines cannot understand the service structure or prospective clients cannot find a confident next step. We review the public website as both a search system and a buyer journey, then connect confirmed problems to evidence, business impact and a prioritized fix plan.
The audit is designed for marketing agencies, web studios, design teams, SEO consultancies and specialist service firms that depend on organic discovery and qualified inquiries.
Titles, descriptions, headings, canonicals, robots directives, sitemap coverage, internal links and whether core services have distinct search intent instead of competing with one another.
First-screen clarity, audience fit, case-study discovery, process pages, team credibility, measurable proof when real, and whether claims are specific enough to support a decision.
Primary calls to action, contact options, form length, field labels, validation, confirmation states, mobile tap targets and the path from a case study to a relevant request.
A generic score is not the deliverable. The useful output is a short list of confirmed issues that explains what may be lost and what should be fixed first.
| Observed problem | What it may cause | Recommended direction |
|---|---|---|
| Several services share one broad page | Search engines receive weak topic signals and buyers struggle to confirm whether the agency solves their exact problem. | Create focused service pages with distinct intent, proof, internal links and a clear inquiry path. |
| Case studies are isolated from service pages | Proof exists, but visitors and crawlers cannot connect the result to the service that produced it. | Link each relevant case study to its service, industry and conversion route using descriptive anchor text. |
| Lead forms ask for too much too early | High-intent mobile visitors may abandon the request before explaining the project. | Reduce the first-step fields, explain what happens next and capture additional detail after contact begins. |
| Tracking stops at page views | The team cannot compare which pages, campaigns or services generate useful inquiries. | Define events for service CTA clicks, form starts, successful submissions, booking actions and pricing interest. |
| Trust information is incomplete | Prospects hesitate when ownership, process, privacy, support or project scope is unclear. | Strengthen contact, methodology, privacy, terms, delivery expectations and evidence-backed proof. |
We separate discovery from recommendation so the team can review evidence before spending development or marketing time.
We inspect the pages and signals available to buyers, search engines and browsers without logging in, testing passwords or accessing private client systems.
Important findings are grouped by SEO, service clarity, proof, forms, mobile flow, measurement and public security posture.
The report identifies affected URLs, explains likely impact, recommends a practical fix and defines what should be retested after implementation.
Continue with the audit layer that matches the agency's current growth constraint.
Send a website URL and email. We review public SEO, mobile, trust and safe security signals, then return the first report.